User Tag List

Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: skin biopsy???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    29
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default skin biopsy???

    Thanks for all the great information so far....
    One more question... about a skin biopsy...Has anyone went to a dermatologist and have them do a biopsy of some of the skin areas had have blistered? I know a friend that had a skin biopsy for Lupus and her dermatologist told her they could tell if she has lupus even if it wasn't active so was just wondering if that would be easier then doing a kidney biopsy. Maybe there are other reasons why they do the kidneys???

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    119
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I read on the internet, when I was first diagnosed, that WG caused unspecific skin lesions on almost all patients.
    I don't have anything like that myself, nor have I ever heard of anyone else complain of such until now.
    Maybe it would be a good idea to visit a dermo just to make sure what you are dealing with.
    Or maybe I am in the dark.


    Sent from my iPhone while driving on the freeway, eating salt, and drinking a 78oz soda.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    895
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My mom has the Livedo Reticularis rash, but from what I have read, if they biopsy, they may only find leukocytoclastic vasculitis which is not specific for GPA or MPA.
    I didn't let them do a core sample on my mom's leg because it would only cause a painful scar and might not show anything conclusive.

    The kidney biopsy seems to be the most accurate in diagnosing MPA and GPA and is not too invasive.
    ANCA antibodies can help as well as a PR3 and MPO antibody test to help verify.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Blacklick, Oh
    Posts
    1,399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I had a rash, and it was biopsied, but it came back negative. it was pretty obviously Vasculitic, based on a a flare, but was not conclusive as far as examination.
    ~ Bob

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    10,836
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My diagnosis was confirmed via biopsy of a rash. I had severe, migratory joint pain, my lungs were hemorrhaging, I had a (+) ANCA and an ESR over 100. The biopsy showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which along with my symptoms made it clear that Wegs was the culprit. I didn't have kidney involvement and a lung biopsy was extremely risky as I was in critical condition

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    302
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My daughter had her biopsy done on her skin also.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    see map location in MN
    Posts
    4,376
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have had some skin lesions biopsied and they turned out to be DSAP and actinic keratosis which are pre cancerous lesions that often occur in people with busted immune systems. They just freeze them with nitrogen to remove them and don't biopsy them anymore unless they look different than the two listed above.
    Knowledge is power! Wisdom is using it to make good decisions!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •