User Tag List

Likes Likes:  0
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Differnece between P Anca Vasculitis and Wegners?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    see map location in MN
    Posts
    4,376
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chrisTIn@ View Post
    I think they need the granulomas in a biopt, to confirm GPA/Wegener's diagose.
    My doc said that if he could have 'all of me' he surely would be able to show the presence of granulomas.
    Where that would be, he couldn't say.
    My kidney biopsy confirmed the disease. They said it was full of Wegener's but I assumed they meant evidence of vasculitis that was causing bleeding since there was blood in my urine.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    551
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drz View Post
    My kidney biopsy confirmed the disease. They said it was full of Wegener's but I assumed they meant evidence of vasculitis that was causing bleeding since there was blood in my urine.
    Well, vasculitis or granulomas, I think if you have Wegener's, you in general have both.
    I mean, it's 'ANCA-positive vasculitis' or Wegener's Granulomatosis.
    If you have Wegener's (GPA, sorry Sangye), your small and medium sized vessels are infected,
    and as a result of the infection, you develope granulomas, that is to say, the tissue of your vessels becomes 'granulomatose'. At least, that is what I understood from all the talking, the reading and the thinking...

    The vessels degenerate, and may even 'fall apart', what is the case when you really have organ- damage, or when you develope the well-known 'saddle-nose', because of degenerating, granulomatosing (falling apart into little pieces) tissue.
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is, in general, the process that we all more or less, suffer from...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    55
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It DOES truly SUCK!!!!! Ok, that was my scream for the night!!! Happy for all of you who can compose yourselves better than I. Danell (Mitch's wife)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    104
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sangye View Post
    P-ANCA = Microscopic polyangiitis (MPA)-- affects small blood vessels; vasculitis without granulomas

    C-ANCA = Wegener's/ Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA)--affects small and medium blood vessels; granulomas + vasculitis

    They are treated the same.
    I find this very confusing. My blood tests say ANCA- MPO and ANCA- PR3, both are usually positve. I do have a lung nodule, brain MRI shows sinus involvement, stage 3 kidney disease, and some other problems. I have not had any biopsies. My doctor just says vasculitis - can you have both types? Do you happen to know how high the ANCA factors(scores?) can get?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wilmington, NC
    Posts
    167
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pberggren1 View Post
    Rtx is Rituxan or Rituximab. It is a biological drug that targets b cells and is big gun like ctx to get Wegs into remission.

    Ctx is Cytoxan or Cyclophosphamide. It is chemo. It is the other big gun to get Wegs into remission.
    Ok Phil, you and I had this conversation before concerning RTX (Facebook I believe). But here is where it is confusing to me...When John had BOTH RTX treatments (They called it Rituximab) on the IV bag it said "CHEMO". So I made reference to the infusion Dr who had come in to hook him up and they stated that it is a form of a chemo???

    Not sure what to make of that!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Swift Current, Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    6,076
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephanie78 View Post
    Ok Phil, you and I had this conversation before concerning RTX (Facebook I believe). But here is where it is confusing to me...When John had BOTH RTX treatments (They called it Rituximab) on the IV bag it said "CHEMO". So I made reference to the infusion Dr who had come in to hook him up and they stated that it is a form of a chemo???

    Not sure what to make of that!
    I am quite certain that rtx is not a classed as a chemo drug. I have asked my doc that a few times.
    Phil Berggren, dx 2003

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Blacklick, Oh
    Posts
    1,399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Technically it is an monoclonal antibody. But it is considered a chemotherapy treatment I believe as well.
    ~ Bob

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    10,836
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Rtx is not a chemotherapy drug, but since it's used to treat Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma they might store it with other chemo drugs. When a nurse administers chemo, s/he has to take many precautions-- wear certain gloves, throw away the IV bag in special waste, etc.... None of that is necessary with rtx.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    ~46N1165W
    Posts
    1,938
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have one of those darned granulomas.... I still have parts of it floating around near the now-dead pituitary....


    Yeap, that's me!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    752
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    When I had my infusions, my Rituxan bag said "Chemo" on it as well. The nurses wore 2 pair of gloves and a cover up over their scrubs.. I also had MRSA on my record at the time so that could be why they used extra pre-caution.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •