drz
02-18-2013, 06:07 PM
My treating doctors have always used what I consider a very liberal definition of remission. If my symptoms are stable or decreasing and supported by same indications in lab work, then no additional or different treatment is required so that means I am in a drug induced remission and any symptoms of Wegs I still have are consider residual symptoms which may or may not improve further.
Then the converse I learned recently is that if i can get through a small flare without any new, different or more aggressive treatment, then it is not really a GPA flare, but an increase in GPA symptoms brought on by infection or some cause other than a GPA flare. They define flare as something that requires more aggressive treatment.
I find this a little confusing and disturbing cause when I get new nasal bleeding, increased pain in my joints, loss of appetite, extreme fatigue all of which remind me of my initial Wegs before my diagnosis and treatment it feels like a flare to me. My inflammation markers are increased just like they were when Wegs was active, I have always viewed that as a small flare or mini flare or mild flare, even if it could be managed just with some extra steroid sprays and antibiotics and lost of rest for a few weeks. These have usually happened when I have a concurrent infection but they never occurred before I had the Wegs. Now I am not sure what to call those episodes. So if they are not a "true flare" what should they be called--pseudo flare or increase in residual Weg symptoms brought on by infection?? Doctors have told me previously that they don't know if the "flare" brings on the infection or the other way around?
So how do you and your doctors define remission? Flare?
Do others have infections with their"flares" too?
Then the converse I learned recently is that if i can get through a small flare without any new, different or more aggressive treatment, then it is not really a GPA flare, but an increase in GPA symptoms brought on by infection or some cause other than a GPA flare. They define flare as something that requires more aggressive treatment.
I find this a little confusing and disturbing cause when I get new nasal bleeding, increased pain in my joints, loss of appetite, extreme fatigue all of which remind me of my initial Wegs before my diagnosis and treatment it feels like a flare to me. My inflammation markers are increased just like they were when Wegs was active, I have always viewed that as a small flare or mini flare or mild flare, even if it could be managed just with some extra steroid sprays and antibiotics and lost of rest for a few weeks. These have usually happened when I have a concurrent infection but they never occurred before I had the Wegs. Now I am not sure what to call those episodes. So if they are not a "true flare" what should they be called--pseudo flare or increase in residual Weg symptoms brought on by infection?? Doctors have told me previously that they don't know if the "flare" brings on the infection or the other way around?
So how do you and your doctors define remission? Flare?
Do others have infections with their"flares" too?