beeinformed
02-10-2012, 09:14 PM
Hi Everyone!
I had seen my ent specialist on Jan. 5th because of several symptoms I was experiencing. One of those symptoms was sinus pain above my eyes and below them as well as a constant nasal drip. After the doctor did a nasal endoscopy, he said that it looked okay. He then suggested I have a ct scan of my sinuses done to confirm any sinus involvement and after the procedure was done, he said the ct scan showed some congestion and nothing more.
Today, I received a copy of the ct scan report (which was reviewed by a radiologist) and the report said that I have "extensive pan-sinusitis as described in the report". The radiologist mentioned a number of times in the report, the term "mucosal thickening", as well as other terms such as "opacified".
I was completely baffled when I received this report because my ent doc said that the ct scan seemed to show some congestion and basically nothing else. I would like to add that my ent doc has extensive experience of inflammatory diseases affecting the ear,nose and throat (especially the latter two).
I am very perplexed and disturbed about my ent doc's interpretation of the ct scan (some congestion) and the interpretation by the radiologist (extensive pan-sinusitis) and would appreciate any explanations or insights that you can give me. Thanks!
I had seen my ent specialist on Jan. 5th because of several symptoms I was experiencing. One of those symptoms was sinus pain above my eyes and below them as well as a constant nasal drip. After the doctor did a nasal endoscopy, he said that it looked okay. He then suggested I have a ct scan of my sinuses done to confirm any sinus involvement and after the procedure was done, he said the ct scan showed some congestion and nothing more.
Today, I received a copy of the ct scan report (which was reviewed by a radiologist) and the report said that I have "extensive pan-sinusitis as described in the report". The radiologist mentioned a number of times in the report, the term "mucosal thickening", as well as other terms such as "opacified".
I was completely baffled when I received this report because my ent doc said that the ct scan seemed to show some congestion and basically nothing else. I would like to add that my ent doc has extensive experience of inflammatory diseases affecting the ear,nose and throat (especially the latter two).
I am very perplexed and disturbed about my ent doc's interpretation of the ct scan (some congestion) and the interpretation by the radiologist (extensive pan-sinusitis) and would appreciate any explanations or insights that you can give me. Thanks!